Infopaket

Philosophy of Logic

ОК 16

Обов’язкова дисципліна для ОП

Second

2021/2022

2 Semester

4

1.to carry out an intellectual search; to identify and critically analyze the relevant problems of modern philosophical thought; to develop them in one's philosophical research. 2. to be able to reconstruct the historical progress of world philosophy, and the evolution of philosophical ideas and issues. 3. have command of the state and foreign language of sufficient level for professional communication and discussion of scientific problems and research results in the field of philosophy. 4. to interpret critically, analyze and evaluate philosophical texts; to apply appropriate methods of their analysis and interpretation. 5. to understand the links of philosophy with other fields of philosophical discourse, intellectual and humanitarian practices. 6. to plan and carry out scientific research on philosophy and related issues; to formulate and test hypotheses, argue conclusions, and present research results in various forms of scientific communication.

Full-time form

1. Students must know the basics of modern logic; 2. Students must be able to use formal methods for the construction of a formal language. 3. Students must have basic skills in the process that takes them from natural to logical language.

Part 1. Formal Logic as a Tool for Philosophy 1 The Origins of Logic Philosophical Logic, Philosophy of Logic, and Formal Philosophy Part 2. Using Formal Methods in Philosophy 3 Formal Methods and the History of Philosophy 4 Modal Logic and Metaphysics 5 Epistemic Logic and Epistemology 6 Logic and Philosophy of Language 7 Formal Investigation of Value Philosophical Problems of Preference and Preference Logic Final test

1. Bennett, J. (2003). A philosophical guide to conditionals. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 3. Garson, J. (2016). Modal logic. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/ entries/logic-modal/ 4. MacFarlane, J. (2015). Logical constants. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato. stanford.edu/entries/logical-constants. 5. Hansson, S. O. (2001). The structure of values and norms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 7. Hodges, W. (2009). Traditional logic, modern logic and natural language. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 38, 589–606. 8. Łukasiewicz, J. (1957). Aristotle’s syllogistic from the standpoint of modern formal logic (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 9. Priest, G. (2005). Towards non-being: The logic and metaphysics of intentionality. Oxford: Clarendon.

Lectures, seminars, self-study

1. Oral presentation: 8 points – The student is fully familiar with the study material, presents it freely and argumentatively, 6 points – The student is sufficiently familiar with the study material and presents it freely, 4 points – The student is familiar with the study material, Addition to oral presentation and participating in discussions: 3 points – the addition is meaningful, 2 points - the addition is meaningful; 1 point – the addition does not contain information impacting the discussion significantly. 2. Self-study – individual written assignment: 40-29 points – The student is fully familiar with the study material, 28–10 points - The student is sufficiently familiar with the study material and presents it freely, 9-6 points - in general possesses the educational material, 3. Final test: (20-0) points

English